Interesting, Pete. My new camera, a Fuji X-H2, has a HEIF option which I have never used and most photo writers I have consulted recommend sticking with JPEG or JPEG plus lossless RAW. Although I have not tested this exhaustively my JPEG files on this camera are often larger than the lossless RAW. Perhaps I should give HEIF a try. Can always convert to JPEG for social media.

Of course not all shots. But trying to get the right exposure means less PP. Failed shots are discarded. This is on good aspect of digital. The downside is people to not TRY to get exposure right. For many years I shot on slide film for magazines. Fixed and action shots. Then you really leant expsure, composition etc….slide was sooo darned expensive!

No doubt, but this is after the fact. Unfortunately one can’t guarantee perfect exposure on all shots, especially test ones. What if a test shot is a “keeper”.

Not really. You can change color casts in jpeg, but that’s not the same thing.

One example? I have one many in RAW and JPG and the final result? At 100% all differences are none, except he additional time taken processing RAW. Plus many PP software will only deal with JPG 😉

can do in JPG as well…

Same with Olympus SOC is amazing

poor exposure….time better spent there than in PP!